Fintechs.fi

Fintech & Crypto News

MetaMask Expands Ethereum Staking with a New Pooled Service

MetaMask Expands Ethereum Staking with a New Pooled Service

MetaMask, the renowned crypto wallet firm, has introduced a pooled staking service, offering a more accessible staking option for Ethereum (ETH) holders. This innovative service allows users to pool their funds and stake their assets in enterprise-grade validators operated by Consensys, a prominent blockchain software company. By eliminating the hefty minimum requirement of 32 ETH, MetaMask is making staking more accessible to a broader range of users.

Overcoming the 32 ETH Barrier

Ethereum’s transition to a proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism requires validators to secure the network by processing transactions, storing data, and adding blocks to the Beacon Chain. Validators are rewarded with interest on their staked coins for participation, but risks are involved, such as slashing penalties for validator misconduct. Despite these benefits, the minimum requirement of 32 ETH, equivalent to about $112,000, has been a significant barrier for most ETH holders. MetaMask’s pooled staking service addresses this challenge, enabling users to participate with less than 32 ETH and still earn staking rewards.

Enhancing Ethereum’s Security and Decentralisation

According to Consensys Senior Product Manager Matthieu Saint Olive, MetaMask’s new service will enhance the security and decentralisation of the Ethereum network. “Having more users staking and more ETH staked is beneficial for Ethereum security,” Saint Olive told Cointelegraph. The underlying validator infrastructure is distributed across multiple cloud providers and regions globally, using various consensus and execution clients to ensure robustness and security.

Addressing the Needs of the Majority

Blockchain data reveals that 99% of ETH holders do not possess the required 32 ETH to become validators. Additionally, 74% of ETH remains unstaked, with much of the staked ETH concentrated in a few large pools. MetaMask’s pooled staking service aims to bridge this gap, offering a solution for users with smaller holdings. Their assets can be unstaked at any time, depending on the validators’ exit queue protocols, adding a layer of flexibility and convenience.

Competing with Established Staking Platforms

While MetaMask’s pooled staking feature is a significant development, it is not the first in the market. Competitors like Lido and Rocket Pool have already established themselves by offering liquid staking tokens (LSTs), which can be borrowed, loaned, or re-invested in decentralised finance (DeFi) protocols. MetaMask’s service currently does not offer LSTs, which might be seen as a limitation compared to these incumbents.

The Regulatory Landscape

Despite its promise, MetaMask’s new staking service is unavailable in the United States or the United Kingdom due to regulatory constraints. The U.S. regulatory environment, marked by significant scrutiny and enforcement actions, poses challenges for staking services. The situation in the UK is slightly less severe but still lacks clarity. Consensys is working to navigate these regulatory landscapes and aims to make the service available in these jurisdictions soon.

Looking Forward

MetaMask’s entry into the pooled staking market represents a step forward in making Ethereum staking more accessible and decentralised. With over 33,000 Ethereum validators and more than 1 million ETH staked under its management, Consensys has a solid foundation to support this new service. While it competes with established players like Lido and Coinbase, MetaMask’s reputation and user base provide a solid platform for its success.

Conclusion

MetaMask’s pooled staking service is a significant move towards democratising Ethereum staking. By lowering the entry barriers, it enables a more significant portion of the ETH community to participate in securing the network and earning rewards. Expanding such services to major markets like the U.S. and the UK will further bolster Ethereum’s security and decentralisation as regulatory environments evolve.